Hopkins Fulfillment Services

Table Of Contents

Part I
1. A Primer on Higher Education Law in the United States
2. A Brief History of Higher Education Litigation in the United States Supreme Court
3. Making It to the Supreme Court and the Rise of Purposive Organizations
Part II
4. The Traditional Model of Higher Education in the Litigation Spotlight: United States v. Fordice
5. Hopwood v. Texas: "A University May Properly Favor One Applicant Over Another Because of His Ability to Play the Cello, Make a Downfield Tackle, or Understand Chaos Theory"
6. Abrams v. Baylor College of Medicine: Jews Need Not Apply
7. Axson-Flynn v. Johnson: "Talk to Some Other Mormon Girls Who Are GoodMormons, Who Don't Have a Problem with This"
8. Location, Location, Location: Richards v. League of United Latin AmericanCitizens and the Cartography of Colleges
9. Clark v. Claremont University Center: "I Mean, Us White People HaveRights, Too"
9. The Developing Law of Faculty Discontent: The Garcetti Effect
Conclusion: My Friends, Special Programs, and Pipelines
Appendix A: Annual Reviews of Higher Education Law
Appendix B: United States v. Fordice, 505 U.S. 717 (1992) Case History